Online assessment standard setting for multiple choice questions.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Standard setting of assessment questions has matured as a psychometric practice since the 1980s1 and is now a common practice in Medical Education.2 This is done to ensure that a fair, defensible cutoff score or pass mark is reached for each assessment paper.3 Standard setting is thus a policy decision as standards are not a natural phenomenon waiting to be discovered,4 neither does the process signify scientific precision. Nevertheless, in order to be defensible standardsetting must be procedurally credible. At the College of Medicine and Health Sciences (CMHS), United Arab Emirates (UAE) University, the Modified Angoff5 procedure of standard setting has been adopted as applicable to all high stakes and end course MCQ examinations since 2014. This test-centered, criterion referenced method of standard setting is one of the most studied and widely used procedures for high stakes examinations.4 At the CMHS, following a period of question vetting, the procedure was initially conducted in face-to-face meetings of appropriate faculty members with subject expertise. In this exercise judges make independent estimates of the proportion of minimally competent candidates that would be expected to answer each item correctly. Where there is a large variation in estimates, judges then discussed discrepancies and revised estimates. Depending on length of discussion and necessity to refine previously vetted questions, the procedure often took an average of three to six hours to standard set an examination of 100 MCQs. In the case of high stakes examinations, the procedure could take several times that amount of time. Although this process had its benefits in further vetting of questions, useful discussion and feedback between faculty members about their understanding of the task, issues surrounding the minimally competent candidate, etc., it was also critiqued by faculty as arduous and time consuming for busy medical subject matter experts. Availability of new technologies have however facilitated evolution of methods and processes of test administration and setting cut scores to meet challenges posed by real and perceived inadequacies of existing processes.6,7 The purpose of this paper is to describe how we implemented an online standard setting procedure which significantly reduces the amount of time needed to standard set examinations.
منابع مشابه
Guessing in Multiple Choice Questions: Challenges and Strategies
Introduction: Guessing is one of the most challenging issues in multiple choice questions. Several strategies, such as negative scoring, have been suggested for preventing students from choosing the right answer just by chance. However, there is no general agreement on using such strategies. The aim of this study was to review the scoring methods which are used for reducing guessing, and evalua...
متن کاملStandard setting in health professions education.
‘Standard setting’ is a process through which the items prepared for the student assessment is standardized before and/or after the student assessment process. The main objective of standard setting is to determine the cut-off score, or pass mark, of an item or a test. The tests represent Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs), Short Answer Questions (SAQs), Objective Structured Practical or Clinical...
متن کاملThe Effect of Two Assessment Methods on Exam Preparation and Study Strategies: Multiple Choice and Essay Questions
Introduction: Utilizing appropriate approaches to study and learning can improve students’ academic performance. Recent studies have shown that students’ learning approaches are influenced by several factors including the type of assessment. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of multiple-choice tests (MCQ) and essay tests on the nursing students’ learning approaches. Methods: This q...
متن کاملThe Impact of Correction for Guessing Formula on MC and Yes/No Vocabulary Tests' Scores
A standard correction for random guessing (cfg) formula on multiple-choice and Yes/Noexaminations was examined retrospectively in the scores of the intermediate female EFL learners in an English language school. The correctionwas a weighting formula for points awarded for correct answers,incorrect answers, and unanswered questions so that the expectedvalue of the increase in test score due to g...
متن کاملA Comparison of Students, Scores in Multiple- Choice and Essay Questions in Mother and Child Health Examination
Background: The method of evaluation in students’ learning affects their studying mode. The aim of this study was to compare nursing students’ scores in essay and multiple-choice questions in Mother and Child Health examination in Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. Methods: In this study, the final scores of 121 of nursing students in a multiple-choice questionnaire consisting of 40 ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- International journal of medical education
دوره 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016